공무집행방해
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a foreigner who is a national of the Republic of Du-2-7 who enters the Republic of Korea as non-resident employment (H-2-7) and the defendant B is a foreigner of the Republic of Duin who enters the Republic of Korea as non-resident (F-5-7).
1. On November 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 01:05, while drinking alcohol at “D’s singing shop” located in Jeju, Defendant 112 was reported and sent to the road front of the instant singing shop by a police officer, a police officer, a police officer belonging to the Seo Seo-gu E District Police Station in Jeju, and a police officer G, etc., who was going to go to the front of the instant singing shop; but (b) the police officer, while going to go to the scene along with the Defendant’s and attempted to go to leave the said place, taken a photograph of the impression of the Defendant and the instant police officer’s appearance “Neine”
Does they place a photograph for marbling
“Freshing the shoulder F of the above slope F and Felman G with his finger, and flaging them two times in two tights, in which H’s chests were tightly cut.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases, maintenance of order, etc. by police officers.
2. Around November 2, 2016, Defendant B, who was arrested as a current offender by a police officer who was called up to the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties on the road prior to the instant singing shop on November 2, 2016, and assaulted Defendant B, who was able to carry the F’s arms with the above slopeF in double hand, with the right hand, and was able to carry on the left hand of the slopeF with the right hand, and who was able to carry on the left hand of the slopeF.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and the arrest of flagrant offenders.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution
1. Each police statement made with H and F;
1. A written statement prepared in the I;
1. Investigation reports (Investigation of the other party of the reporter);
1. 112 Reporting case handling table;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing victims' photographs, CCTV data, on-site and suspect photographs, and video CDs, which obstruct the performance of official duties;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;
A. Defendant A: each of them.