A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the D's home delivery company located in Chungcheong City C, Defendant B is employed by Defendant A to work as a delivery engineer, Defendant A applied for the first-time examination for the education of high school graduates conducted by the Cheongbuk-do Office of Education in 2015, but he did not pass the first-time examination for the education of high school graduates conducted by the Cheongbuk-do Office of Education, but was willing to have Defendant B look at the agency examination.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed at the end of March 2015, 2015: (a) Defendant A sent the above examination to Defendant B on his behalf; and (b) Defendant B opened the Defendant’s driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner General of the Chungcheongbuk-gu National Police Agency to present the examination to the inspector prior to the commencement of the examination, and opened a warning so that he can look at a similar face; and (c) Defendant B opened a public contest on behalf of the Defendant A.

Accordingly, on April 12, 2015, Defendant B entered the F Middle School G located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and from around 09:00 to around 15:40 of the same day, Defendant B presented the first test notice of the academic achievement certification for high school graduates from the above G in 2015 (Korean language, Korean language, Korean language, Korean language, Korean language, Korean language, Korean language, Korean language, Korean history, Korean history, Korean history, Korean history, Korean history), and submitted the above driver’s license certificate received from the Defendant to H, etc. at the time of confirmation of the status prior to the start of each test, and submitted the Defendant A’s name and number of examination (I) in each test answer in lieu of Defendant A.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the management and supervision of high school graduates in the first time in 2015, including H who are public officials through fraudulent means.

2. On March 2015, Defendant A stated that the above company showed the above examination on behalf of Defendant A, as described in paragraph (1), and as described in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the above B is the defendant.