beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2018.05.01 2018고단50

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a B-learning car.

On December 23, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on December 16:30, 2017, and led the Defendant to proceed to the intersection of the 146 central road from the Hanman-ro, Taee-ro, Hane-ro, Taee-ro, Hane-ro, the Hae-do Hae-ro, Hane-do.

At the same time, there are no signals such as signal, and since the place where the passage of a vehicle is high, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, such as reducing the speed prior to the crossing and checking the right and the right and the right of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went on to the yellow pond from the 3rd side of the C Zone by negligence, and received the upper part of the D'(60 ) drive EM5 for boarding on the right side of the D'(60 ) and then received the upper part of the D's upper part.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant damaged the MF5 car by the aforementioned negligence, such as the backer, etc., and immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as informing the personal information.

2. On December 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from the Defendant from the background FF belonging to the C District Zone in the Thai Bae Police Station C on the face, snicking, etc. at the apartment parking lot located in the same Haak-do, Taecheon-do, Taecheon-do, Taecheon-do; (b) around December 16:5, 2017.

In order to verify whether a person is under the influence of alcohol due to reasonable grounds, he/she was required to comply with a drinking test.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a demand for a drinking test from around 17:01 to around 17:19 on the same day on four occasions, but did not comply with a police officer’s demand for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D. D.