성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, forty hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program, confiscation) is too unreasonable.
2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and made efforts to prevent recidivism, such as receiving a mental therapy, etc., the crime of this case is not suitable in light of the contents of video taken into account as an unspecified number of unspecified persons for a considerable period of time. The defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he was under the same probation period, there is no special change in circumstances after the sentence of the judgment below, and all of the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, including the defendant’s age, character, character, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., are considered in light of the above circumstances favorable to the defendant, the sentence of the court below is not deemed to be unfair even if
Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.