2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a situation where the economic situation is difficult, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime in the past, as well as the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime for the same crime, equity with the criminal punishment for other crimes similar to the instant crime, and the age, happiness and family environment of the Defendant, the developments leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.