On December 14, 2012, around 17:10 on December 14, 2012, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the victim D (the age of 41)'s name, and the victim D (the age of 41) entered the house in front of the defendant's dwelling entrance in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the victim's entrance and exit were 3 complete escapes on the right side, the left-hand side, the left-hand side, and the left-hand side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Two times the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. E statements;

1. A certificate of injury to D;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Evidence records, 75 pages, 81 pages);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there is no fact that the defendant's entry into the victim was made in drinking.

In full view of the above evidence, we can find out the following circumstances: (a) the victim and E, who observed at the time of the instant case, stated in the investigative agency and court that the defendant was the victim's drinking time; (b) the intent to issue the written diagnosis of injury to the victim was the victim's victim; (c) G, who was F and the victim's denial, demanded the medical expenses of the victim in the presence of the victim; and (d) the defendant demanded the medical expenses of the victim in the presence of the victim; and (e) the defendant stated that he was not able to reach an agreement; and (e) considering these circumstances, it is reasonable to determine that the defendant was the victim's drinking time.

The reason for sentencing is that the victim's injury is not against the defendant, the victim is punished, and the defendant deposited money for the victim.