사기
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On April 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on April 25, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 25, 2017.
1. On May 2016, the Defendant against the victim C may terminate the phone call used to change the mobile phone and exchange the phone via a new phone to the victim C.
However, the payment of the horse or the fee was made by false statement. "Mad."
However, even if the defendant opens a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the terminal price and the mobile phone fee according to the agreement.
The Defendant, as above, did not pay KRW 1,793,90 for the two mobile phones, even though he sold (D) mobile phone terminals with heavy weighted and used cash after deceiving the victim, and opened two mobile phones in the name of the victim who believed that it is true, and then acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.
2. On June 2016, the Defendant against the Victim F would pay KRW 100,000,000 to the Victim F (C’s partner) (“FF”) (“FFF”) “In the event it has opened a cellular phone by lending the name to open the cell phone,” and KRW 100,000,000 when terminated after the three months.
Along with the fact that the mobile phone mobile phone prices and charges, the mobile phone prices and charges were known to the public, they were false.
However, even if the defendant opens a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he/she did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price and fees, and there was no intention or ability to terminate the mobile phone after three months.
The Defendant, as seen above, did not pay KRW 958,90 for the last time while deceiving the victim and opening the cell phone in the name of the victim who believed that it is true, sold the device with a heavy weight and used cash, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.
3. The Defendant who committed fraud against seven persons, including victims G, etc., “business performance.”