An application for remedy by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The fraud defendant, as the guest of the beauty art room in Seoul, which is operated by the victim C, was aware of the victim and maintained a close relation with the victim. While the defendant's husband was in military service as his husband, or retired from the defendant's aviation with his her son, the defendant did not have been engaged in the construction business. However, the victim argued to the purport that "the defendant's husband was receiving 170,000 won per month as pension after 30 years of military service by her husband, and she was serving in the aviation for the son, and after her retirement, she believed the victim to believe that the defendant was a able person who had re-contributed with the defendant."

After that, the Defendant, around November 24, 2014, held the victim “F” as the head of the construction team destroying the base from Embrypt calendar to the victim, and there is a lack of money to be reduced as wages.

section 3.

On the other hand, a false statement was made that “The payment shall be made ten days after receiving money from F when he/she borrowed money.”

However, even if the Defendant knew that F was not the leader of the subway Construction Work, he did not think that F was able to use the money as F’s wage even if he was aware of the fact that F was not the leader of the subway Construction Work, and he did not have any intent or ability to repay it within 10 days even if he did not borrow money from the victim because he did not have any other financial ability different from that of the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 2,50,000 from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant, and from October 29, 2015, the defendant was delivered KRW 18,855,00,000 from the victim by the same method until October 29, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.