According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only a case on which death penalty, imprisonment with or without prison labor for an indefinite term or for not less than ten years has been pronounced, an appeal may be filed on the ground that the judgment of the court below has influenced the judgment

Therefore, in this case where the Defendant was sentenced to a fine against the Defendant, the Defendant did not have committed any act of purchasing the victim’s sex, and the argument disputing the selection of evidence and the recognition of facts belonging to the exclusive authority of the lower court is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, the argument that there is an error in violation of the rules of reinforcement of confession in the judgment below is not a legitimate ground for appeal since the defendant alleged in the ground for appeal that he did not consider it as a ground for appeal or that the court below did not consider

Furthermore, even if examining the record, the lower court did not err by its assertion.

In addition, in light of the records, the court below did not err by infringing on the defendant's right to trial, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.