beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단2285

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on February 13, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 17, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 14, 2016.

[ criminal facts] The defendant is a person operating D Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of advertising agency business in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 405, and E is a person operating F Co., Ltd., and G is the victim I's representative director in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H and 4 floors.

At the above I Office around October 2013, the Defendant: (a) through E, conducted the business of establishing a counseling 600 to 700 through the whole country for the prevention of juvenile crimes, as part of the so-called “4 large loans,” which are the presidential commitments; (b) the business is conducted together with the meeting, the National Police Agency, the incorporated associationJ (K), etc. in the direction of female family members in the Republic of Korea; (c) from March 2014, an order for the production and installation of counseling ice will begin; (d) the IBK bank decided to participate in the consultation division; (e) the IBK bank was to receive KRW 1.5 billion from the management of assets; and (e) the KIB Group already deposited KRW 3 billion investment funds with the initial operation funds; and (e) the principal and interest amount from the first 300 million loan to the victim on March 1, 2014 shall be repaid immediately after the first 30 billion advance payment.

“A false statement” was made, and a copy of the check was received from the Korean Exchange Group as investments.

However, it is impossible to obtain a large-scale permit to occupy and use a road for the installation of a counseling room from a large number of local governments, there is no agreement between the IBK Bank and ATM to establish an IBK Bank, and it was invalidated due to the failure to meet the terms of the prior approval and the lapse of the effective period.