2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 15, 2018, at the emergency room of the C Hospital located in Busan Young-gu, Busan, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the victim E (36 years old), who is a doctor, is not treated even though he/she left after he/she's daily eyebrow was teared; and (b) on the ground that other patients, hospital employees, etc. are observed, the Defendant is the victim’s “Choe fe, dicule” while other patients, hospital employees, etc. are observed.

If the director of the hospital does not do so, you do so.

has given a set of value,

C. The term “C. .........” was a large interest rate.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

2. Statement made by the police for E.

3. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

2. Grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are to be confined in a workhouse.

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to two million won; and

2. In this case, the sentence of sentence shall be determined by the Defendant’s abusive language at the emergency room of a hospital during night to the victim, who is a doctor, and the nature of the offense and the circumstances are not good.

The defendant's crime seems to have caused considerable mental suffering to the victim, and it seems that the medical service of the hospital emergency room is difficult.

Nevertheless, the defendant has not received a letter from the injured party.

Furthermore, the Defendant was sentenced to a grace period of ten months for the reason of obstructing the performance of official duties on July 7, 2017, and again committed the instant crime during the grace period, and the Defendant had been punished for violent crimes more than ten times (three times of suspended execution and seven times of fine).

However, the defendant's occupational behavior led to the hospital to receive emergency treatment, and the defendant's occupational behavior leads to the following salary fluence from the injured party because he or she was in a state of personnel in a fluent state, and he or she received the following salary fluence. This case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case.