부당이득금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 574,808,223 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from December 15, 2015 to February 12, 2016.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff as the party concerned is a corporation with the purpose of acquiring, developing, reserving, supplying, leasing and managing land for the development of housing sites. The Defendant is a company that engages in business under the Insurance Business Act, such as surety insurance, credit insurance, and reinsurance.
B. On December 30, 2005, the 111,278,267m2, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-si, Suwon-si, and Dong-si, the Plaintiff was designated as a development project district of the luminous site, and the special planning zone 6 (hereinafter “instant special planning zone”) within the development project district of the luminous Housing Site.
A) A zone consisting of commercial sites and main complex sites is a special planning zone established for the purpose of creating a complex commercial and cultural space that represents the south side area of the Seoul Metropolitan Area by constructing “department stores, discount stores, sports centers, theaters, indoor play facilities, cultural facilities, etc.” 2) The Plaintiff recruited the instant special planning zone in the direction of “i) the formation of a complex commercial and cultural space that represents the south side area of the Seoul Metropolitan Area; (ii) the formation of an urban space that contributes to the enhancement of convenience of residents and the regional economic revitalization; and (iii) the creation of a symbolic complex that is linked with the surrounding source amusement park; and (iv) the creation of a complex with a symbolic image that is specialized in urban image as an access part of the south side of the Gwangju Metropolitan Area (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”); and (v) the selection of a private business entity on April 15, 2008.
C. The consortium of this case and the project agreement of this case were concluded 1 Korea Development Bank, Treatment Construction Co., Ltd., lot construction Co., Ltd., 20 Construction Co., Ltd., Copul Construction Co., Ltd., Gyeongnam Co., Ltd., Gyeongnam Co., Ltd., Hanil Construction Co., Ltd., Hanil Construction Co., Ltd., Kuil Construction Co.,