A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. The Defendant: (a) around 01:45 on January 28, 2018, at the friendly meeting office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangdong-gu, the Victim B (68 tax) who is a friendship member and the Victim B (68 tax) who is a friendly member and the Defendant was able to fluorize the victim.

for this reason, “I do not play until 2 times” to the victim.

In addition, I saw the gue, “A gue in the same gue,” and read the victim’s flaps together with the victim, with flaps together with flaps, and cut the victim’s flaps together with flaps. The victim flabeded the victim’s flaps by drinking the Defendant’s flaps with flapsing the Defendant’s flaps with the Defendant’s flaps.

In this respect, the defendant set up a cupup at the left side, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, on the right side side.

2. Defendant B, at the same date, at the same time, and at the same place as the above paragraph 1, set up against the victim A(60)’s violent exercise, and assaulted the victim, such as plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. of the victim’s left hand hand, by breaking up the victim’s brush.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. Some statements concerning the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol

1. Statement made by the police against Defendant B;

1. Each complaint filed by the defendant B and A;

1. In the investigation report (Attachment of a victim’s photo on the part of the victim’s damage) [Attachment of a victim’s photo] : (a) Defendant B and his defense counsel are merely a fact that the Defendant unilaterally assaults the Defendant and attempted to do so, and there was no assault by plucking, plucking, etc. A’s fingers as indicated in the crime No. 2 of the judgment; and (b) even if the act of booming A’s finger belts constitutes an assault, it constitutes a legitimate defense or legitimate act as an act for passive defense against A’s act of violence.

However, in light of the statements, etc. in A's investigation agency and this court, the defendant is satisfy with A.