When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 10:20 on October 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was able to see the victim’s words “at the time she was frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten,” and “at the time she was frighten,” and “at the time she was frighten, frighten, frighten,” and “at the victim’s body.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The first protocol concerning the examination of suspect B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;