손해배상(산)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Defendants in excess of the amount ordered under the following Paragraph 2 shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is either added or added as set forth in the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and as to the assertion emphasized by the Defendants in this court, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for the addition of the judgment as set forth in paragraph (3) below. Thus,
2. On the fourth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part added or used after adding “Evidence” of No. 13, and then adding “the results of fact inquiry with respect to the National Pension Service” to “Evidence” of this Court.
No. 5 of the first instance judgment is subject to the first instance judgment with "102,175,159 won".
According to the fifth judgment of the first instance, the fourth-5 conduct shall be followed as follows:
[3] Amount after deduction of disability benefits: 102,175,159 won = 139,106,129 won - 32,003,600 won - 4,927,370 won as follows: 6.19 of the judgment of the first instance shall be conducted as follows.
D. Future medical expenses: 10,135,126 won is required for future medical expenses for the sexual surgery and future medical treatment expenses, and there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff spent them on October 12, 2018, which is the day following the date of the closing of pleadings in the trial, and thus, KRW 14,478,752 is considered to have been paid on October 12, 2018, and when calculating the current price at the time of the instant accident, it would be KRW 10,135,126 (= KRW 14,478,752 x 70%) when calculating the limitation of liability of the Defendants.
Furthermore, the Plaintiff also sought payment of the future medical expenses in the field of emotional distress. However, according to the result of the physical commission by the first instance court for the head of the Seoul Hospital Hospital at the time of the physical examination, the medical treatment was deemed necessary in the field of emotional distress since February 8, 2017, which is the date of the physical examination. There was no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff actually spent the medical expenses after the date of the said appraisal, and one year has already passed since the date of said appraisal, the medical expenses in the field of emotional distress and the future medical treatment are not
[Attachment 7] 1-7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.