도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On April 25, 200, at around 06:30 on April 25, 200, A, an employee of the Defendant in the facts charged of the instant case, operated the freight of 11.1 ton of B car trucks in the third axis of B car trucks at the 67-line National Cancer 67 line, Man-gun, Man-gun, Man-gun, Man-gun, Man-gun, Man-gun, and violated
2. Of the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act, which is a joint penal provision, with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine provided for in the corresponding Article." The decision of unconstitutionality was rendered by the Constitutional Court that the provision of the same Act is in violation of the Constitution over two occasions, and accordingly, the provision of
Therefore, since each of the facts charged in this case constitutes a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.