1. A shall be punished by a fine of two million won;

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, money is made.

Defendant

A,

1. On November 15, 2017, from around 15:30 to around 08:00 of the same month, EFF, operated by the victim D, on the road side of the National Highway No. C. 25 National Road of Changwon-si, on the ground that the victim does not bring the satisfy harvested by the victim into the Defendant’s low temperature warehouse, the Defendant was parked in front of the GF vehicle in which the satisfy of the victim’s satisfy was loaded, and the said cargo vehicle cannot be operated after the said cargo vehicle:

2. On November 17, 2017, around 08:30, the victim D operated in the window I of Changwon-si, and on the same grounds as described in paragraph 1, the victim obstructed the victim’s schip transportation by force by means of force, by parking the vehicle on the bridge of the above orchard and parking the vehicle on the bridge of the above orchard and making it impossible for the damaged person to pass through the vehicle on which the reduction of work performed by the injured person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning a crime and Article 314 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Defendant A and Defendant B of the facts charged under Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act (written application for permission to amend the bill of indictment on October 1, 2018) are as follows: from November 15, 2017 to November 19:00 of the same day, Defendant A and Defendant B left a shop to search for the Defendants, on the ground that the victim’s partner D did not have a sense of her promise with the Defendants at the store of the victim K (V, 56 years old); Defendant A left the shop to search for the Defendant; Defendant A left the shop to remove the d and left the place of sale to remove the d; Defendant A left the floor to remove the d and left the place of sale to remove the d and left the floor to remove the d and left it as it was by leaving the floor to remove, and Defendant C left this hump by leaving the victim’s humbling as it was.