A. The occurrence of liability ① (a) driving a private taxi at around 22:45 on March 15, 2015, while driving the private taxi at around 22:45 and driving the three lanes prior to D in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and stopping the taxi in accordance with the stop signal around the crosswalk. It is negligent in neglecting the access to the right side of the lane to ensure that the taxi driver stops at the right side of the lane or makes it possible for the passenger to safely load the taxi, but neglected the approach, such as the Ortob, etc., through the rear cry, etc., the Defendant is not liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred to the Plaintiff, which is the owner of the taxi at the right side of the after mad taxi, and the Defendant is not liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred to the Plaintiff, such as the closure of the gake, light, and tension of the upper part of the taxi (hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the mutual aid agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter the above 3rd party).

B. On the other hand, according to the aforementioned evidence, even if the plaintiff, as the plaintiff, was to stop or overtake the above crosswalk in accordance with the vehicle stop signal prior to the above crosswalk, it can be recognized that the accident of this case occurred while intending to overtake the above taxi by using a narrow gap between the above taxi and the edge of the sidewalk while neglecting his duty of care and neglecting his duty of care. Such circumstance also seems to have contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the accident of this case, it shall be considered in determining the amount of damages to be paid by the defendant, and the occurrence of the accident of this case shall be considered.