도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On February 15, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 10 million by the same court on December 19, 2014 with the same offense, etc. in the case of a violation of Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court) on February 15, 2013.
[2] Although Defendant 1 violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act two or more times, Defendant 2 driven Cunststam car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.176% in the 30-meter section from the front of the Southern-gu Yancheon-gu Yancheon-ro 53, Yancheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to the front of the 103rd apartment of approximately 103 meters in the same Eup/Myeon to the front road of the 103rd apartment of about the same Eup/Myeon.
On April 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 5:21 on April 201, 2017, the Defendant: (b) driven a vehicle in a drunken state at the 5th 103 front parking lot located in the south-gu, Southern-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 51-2; (c) 112 after he shocked the freight vehicle parked at the 51-2 front of that parking lot; and (d) on the ground that the Defendant demanded the Defendant to have the alcohol measured by the police box affiliated with the police box affiliated with the Nam-gu, Southern-gu, Police Station D of the Republic of Korea, where he was dispatched after receiving the 112 report.
A driver was under the influence of the same rings, but the driver was not under the influence of alcohol.
“In doing so, at the same time, you interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order by taking the parts of E one time by hand.
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Highest 495"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The circumstantial report of the driver employed at the main place;
1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;
1. Previous convictions in the judgment: References to inquiries and investigation reports (Attachment to the previous convictions concerned with the previous convictions), 2017, 535;
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 1, and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking, the choice of imprisonment, and the choice of punishment) concerning the crime, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the choice of imprisonment);
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.