However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On February 28, 2016, from around 04:38 to 05:31, the Defendant: (a) at the “D” store managed by the victim C of the 1st floor B in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul; (b) by having the stone around the 1st floor, flicked a flick with a flick with a flick with the market price of KRW 3 million owned by the victim, which was invaded at the 219th floor; and (c) by intrusioning the surrounding area, the Defendant stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on the results of field identification;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the scene of damage, photograph of a dynamic image to escape before, and after committing a crime, and photograph of a damaged shotos;

1. Article 331 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the grounds that the thief was not repaid