When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 10, 2015, around 11:40 on September 10, 2015, the Defendant heard by one employee of the Gu office in front of the Defendant’s house located in Yongsan-si Member C, Changwon-si, Masan-si, and sought from the victim D.

The honor of the victim was damaged by publicly pointing out facts by allowing one employee of the Gu office to hear with the large sound.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D and E’s respective legal statements (the defendant and his defense counsel did not make the same statement as the defendant entered in the facts constituting a crime;

The argument is asserted.

However, D consistently expressed the above words in investigative agencies and this court.

In light of the fact that the defendant made a statement and the witness E makes the same statement, the defendant has damaged the honor of the victim by speaking as stated in the facts of crime.

It is reasonable to view it.

The defendant and defense counsel's assertion is without merit).

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (1) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;