beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.12.17 2013구합2001181

수용보상금증액

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 2,832,50 to the Plaintiff the annual rate of KRW 20% from December 18, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice 1): River project (B Maintenance Corporation; hereinafter “instant project”);

2) Public notice of district designation: The Defendant

B. Land to be expropriated by the Governor of the Jeollabuk-do Regional Land Tribunal on January 25, 2013 (hereinafter “Adjudication of Expropriation”): D-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, the Plaintiff owned (hereinafter “instant land”): 515 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) An appraisal (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) A: 29,973,000 won (58,200 won per square meter) for the future appraisal corporation: 30,385,000 won (59,000 won per square meter) for compensation for losses: 30,179,000 won (58,600 won for a unit price per square meter) for 30,385,000 won: average amount for the appraisal of expropriation; 58,600 won for a unit price per square meter; and

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of objection on November 21, 2013 (hereinafter “the said ruling”) 1) appraisal (hereinafter “appraisal of objection”) is subject to appraisal by the said Committee (hereinafter “assessment of objection”).

(A) A) Gyeongil Appraisal Corporation: 30,745,500 won (59,700 won for a unit price per square meter): Compensation for losses: 31,569,500 won (61,300 won for a unit price per 1 square meter) : 31,157,500 won (60,500 won for a unit price per 1 square meter, an average amount for a result of appraisal of objection) / [based on recognition] without dispute; 1,2, 600 won for a unit price for a 1 square meter; 2, 3, 500 won for a unit price for a 31,57,500 won for a unit price for a 31,500 square meter; hereinafter the same shall apply); each entry in the statement, as a whole,

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s objection objection appraisal and the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal to appraiser E (hereinafter “court appraisal”) are unfair in the following sense, so the Defendant should pay to the Plaintiff the amount stated in the purport of the claim, which is a part of the difference between the reasonable compensation and the compensation for the objection.

1. The amount of appraisal of this case or the amount of appraisal by the court is too low compared to the purchase price, etc. of the land of this case, compared with the purchase price, input costs, and market price of the land of this case.