2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On June 9, 2010, the defendant against the defendant of the non-party comprehensive architect office city of the non-party corporation (hereinafter "non-party corporation"), the defendant entered into a joint contract jointly implemented in accordance with a certain ratio of investment by the members of the joint venture company ("the joint venture company" means a joint contract jointly implemented in accordance with the joint venture company's construction design, joint performance 65%), the non-party company (the "joint performance method" means a joint contract jointly implemented in accordance with a certain ratio of investment) and the Samjin Tech Engineering Co., Ltd. (the "joint venture group" means a joint contract jointly implemented in accordance with a certain ratio of share by the members of the joint venture company), the joint venture company consisting of nuclear powern&C (electric, telecommunication, electricity fire-fighting, included, shared performance) and the joint venture company consisting of the non-party corporation A1, A3, A44, B5, S1 block plan, 25, S1 block interim construction/working contract (hereinafter "the service contract of this case"), 4,8504,704,7140

Part II. Payment of service fees, etc. attached to the instant service contract

1. According to the standard agreement on the timing and amount of payment for the service price, the payment for the service price is determined as listed below, and according to the joint supply and demand agreement, the joint supply and demand agreement provides that advance payment, payment for work price, etc. shall be made to individual members as prescribed by the provisions of Chapter III-7 of the Guidelines for the Management of Local Government Tender and Contracts (Article 8 of the Joint Supply and Demand Agreement) (Article 8 of the Joint Supply and Demand Agreement). The non-party company performed the design service of the “after the completion of the execution design plan - the first completion of the first completion” in the above schedule, and received the total amount of KRW 824,514,437 by July 31, 2012.

The Plaintiff’s seizure and collection order of this case against the non-party company based on the original copy of the payment order finalized by Seoul Central District Court No. 2013 tea56257.