beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.04.17 2013고합322

인질강도등

Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for three years, Defendant B, C, and D’s imprisonment for one year and six months, Defendant E, and F respectively for three million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates S in Daejeon-gu and engages in high-class external loan business, Defendant A's friendship, Defendant C and D's friendship, Defendant A and B's follow-up distribution, Defendant F's loan to Defendant A by driving the aforesaid S, and Defendant E is a high-class external loan business.

Defendant

A around December 2012, 2012, L lent 4 high-class passenger cars (bench flus fluor, Benz E300, Benz S500, and RuxJ) to T and R around September 2012, the Defendant E lent 4 high-class passenger cars (benz E300, BM 528, BM 328I, Eascuador) to T and R.

However, the above Defendants did not receive rent from T or R, and some automobiles were disposed of as security against a third party, and thus, they could not find the location of the vehicle, and T or R had no contact with the third party around that time.

Accordingly, Defendant A had experienced economic difficulties, such as entering the cost of KRW 12 million per month with lease fees, etc., and sought to resolve the problem of T and R about 4 automobiles. Defendant B, C, and D knew of the above circumstances of Defendant A, and Defendant B, C, and D were about to look at the apartment parking lot in Seoul Gangnam-gu from April 2013 to September 2013 at the same time and attempted to move to Defendant A, such as T and finding the location of R and vehicle, and Defendant E also had economic difficulties, such as bearing lease charges for high-quality automobiles purchased in the name of East and People.

1. Defendants A, B, C, and D’s violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) discovered the victim T on September 12, 2013, around 605, and around 12:08, the Songpa-gu Seoul U.S. U. building B, and Defendant A stated that the victim T (the south and 40 years old) is “ how much high,” and that the Defendant A is “ how high,” which is a dangerous object, 50cm in length, and the written indictment as “humpe” but according to the witness T’s witness T’s legal statement, Defendant A.