근로기준법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months and the suspension of execution of two years) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the defendant recognizes and reflects his own crime, and the fact that the defendant has no particular criminal record except that he has been punished once by a fine due to a crime of this kind is favorable.
However, as for the instant crime, delayed payment of wages, etc. is a crime that undermines the basic life of workers and threatens their family's survival, and the amount of unpaid wages and retirement allowances, etc. is considerably large, and workers' wages and retirement allowances, etc. seems to have not yet been paid in full. In full view of all the sentencing conditions stated in the instant records, including Defendant's age, environment, sex, criminal conduct, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court's sentencing is too excessive and it is difficult to see that the Defendant's above assertion is unfair, without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.