beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고정627

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving business. On October 30, 2012, around 13:44, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C (the age of 42) and the traffic accident (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) around the Songcheon-gu, Songcheon-gu, Songcheon-gu (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). Around October 30, 2012, the Defendant, who was in charge of driving business, brought about the injury, such as light salt, etc. in need of two weeks’ medical treatment on the part of the victim.

2. Determination

A. As evidence to prove the facts charged of the instant case, there is a photograph and a written diagnosis of injury taken by the victim to the effect that the victim suffered a statement or injury at an investigative agency.

B. However, according to the records of this case, the following facts are recognized.

1) Upon the occurrence of the instant traffic accident from the police, the victim stated that he had the Defendant get her to get her her her her her her her with her her her own her her her and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her with her her her her her her her her with her her her her her her her her and her her her her her her with her her her her her her her her her with her her her her her her her her with her her her her her her her her with her her her her with her her her own her her

However, according to the evidence No. 4 (Co., Ltd.) of this case, the Defendant called Samsung Fire Co., Ltd., an automobile insurance company, after the occurrence of the instant traffic accident, and received an accident. Around 2/18 seconds after the call begins, the Defendant called for approximately three minutes after the call begins to the counselor, and called for about three minutes after the call begins.