beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.05.19 2013고합518

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강간)등

Text

The Defendant’s motion to attach an attachment order against the person to whom the attachment order was requested is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The facts charged and a summary of the grounds for requesting an attachment order [the facts prosecuted]

A. A. On February 11, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (similar act to disabled persons) set up a parking lot near the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitanro basin, Guro-gu, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, around 200, the Defendant 2nd degree of intellectual disability and her child or juvenile D (the age of 15) known through the Internet obscenity’s obscenity during the leave of absence at the military house; and (b) her boomed the victim with his/her cryth and her cryth, and parked the victim into the underground parking lot near the above Guro-gu basin; (c) her body flicked the victim with his/her back seat; and (d) her chestd the victim with his/her panty, she boomed him/herself, and she boomed him/herself by taking the victim’s boom, and her boomed him/herself.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a disabled child or juvenile and committed similar acts.

B. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape with Persons with Disabilities) committed an assault, such as inserting the victim into the part of the victim’s drinking room and inserting the victim’s clothes on March 2, 2013, on the ground that: (a) the victim met with the victim D by holding the victim in custody; (b) the victim returned to his/her own vehicle to the mother telecom with his/her own trade name unknown; and (c) he/she took off the victim’s clothes on the ground that he/she did not bring the victim’s clothes; and (d) he/she did not bring the victim’s clothes back to the bed; and (c) she took off the victim’s panty and pushed off the victim from the bed; (d) forced the victim’s legs; and (e) took the victim’s legs to force the victim’s bridge.

As a result, the defendant is a disabled child or juvenile.