Examining the various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age character and behavior intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive means and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., there is no substantial reason to recognize that the lower court’s sentencing of the Defendant, which maintained the first instance judgment that sentenced 18 years to imprisonment with prison labor, is extremely unfair even when considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the national defense counsel.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.