When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the friendship of D.

On April 3, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the claim lawsuit between the Plaintiff E and the Defendant in Ulsan-gu District Court No. 111, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S.A. on April 16:0, 2014, the Defendant appeared in the court of the above court of 2013 D's 2832, such as consolation money between the Plaintiff E and the Defendant D, and gave testimony. The facts are as follows: “E” from the Ulsan-gu Housing from October 1998 to March 2008, the Defendant was living together with the Defendant’s mother-do Multi-dong 102, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., G apartment from March 1012. At the time of the purchase of the above G apartment, the Defendant and E were found to be residing together with the real estate at the time of the purchase of the above apartment.

Nevertheless, at the time of the testimony above, the defendant Eul was killed in the house of the defendant (D) from around 1997 to March 1998 to around 2012 as the defendant (D) and the witness.

“I do not enter the same place in one place” for the question “.”

“Written answer” and “G apartment Da-dong 102, Defendant D, the witness of which was written as the witness.”

The question “I am in the name of the workplace with only the name and the place of work so far and F.

“The witness continued to live in F”, and “the witness did not live in F.

“To answer,” “I will do so.”

“The answer was made.”

With respect to the above G apartment purchased in the name of the defendant around 2005, "(E) at the time of the conclusion of the contract," the plaintiff(E) did not have been employed.

“ did not have any question.”

“The answer,” and the need for the plaintiff (E) to reside in G apartment.

“At the risk of gathering” a question

The answer is that “G apartment is owned by the witness, but only purchased G apartment and did not actually live in it,” and the witness is “I do not have any record that he had resided in G apartment together with the Plaintiff (E) and Defendant (D).”

“The answer was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory as above, and issued a perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;