A. It is true that the defendant obtained one national card lost by the victim and approved the use of the card when purchasing goods thereafter.

However, the Defendant acquired the above card with the intent to return it to the victim. Since the appearance of the above card was similar to that of the JJ's credit card held by the Defendant, after the Defendant purchased goods, the Defendant obtained approval by mistake for the use of the credit card owned by the victim when the Defendant purchased goods, the Defendant embezzled the credit card that left the possession of the victim as stated in the facts charged.

There was no intention to commit the crime or to use it.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which pronounced the defendant guilty is unfair as it misleads the facts.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 살피건대, 원심 및 당심에서 제출된 자료 등에 의하면, ① 피고인은 위 ‘E’ 의류판매점에서 피해자의 신용카드를 사용해 양복을 구입하면서 3개월 할부로 결재하였는데, 이후 구입한 양복을 다른 것으로 교환해 추가로 73,200원을 더 결재하여야 했을 때 다시 피해자의 신용카드를 사용하려고 하였으나, 한도 초과로 승인이 거절되자 피고인 자신 명의의 삼성카드를 사용한 점(증거기록 7, 9, 45쪽), ② 피고인은 과거 그 처인 J 명의의 국민카드를 사용해 물품을 결재한 적이 있는데, 위 J의 국민카드(CJ이퀸즈)와 피해자의 국민카드(CJ패스)의 외관이 서로 매우 유사한 점(증 제1 내지 4호)은 인정된다.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant acquired the lost victim's credit card and embezzled and lost the lost victim's occupied object at his own discretion.