도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 18, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Daegu District Court, the Daegu District Court, Kimcheon Branch, etc., and was issued a summary order of three million won by the same court on September 30, 2013.
On March 19, 2014, at around 23:12, the Defendant driven a C-hurburged vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.081% under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the cafeteria, “fresh,” which is in the Yellow East-si, Sinsi, to the front side of the Dong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
As a result, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice and drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver's license.
2. On March 19, 2014, at around 23:18, the Defendant: (a) carried a drunk driving on the roads of Pyeongtaek-gu, Pyeongtaek-dong, as described in paragraph (1), on the roads of Pyeongtaek-si; (b) was discovered to the assistant of the police box affiliated with the former U.S. police station; and (c) was able to ask for personal information to the said assistant E who is the Defendant’s birth.
The Defendant issued F’s resident registration number to the said slope E at the same time at the D police box located in G, and entered the “F” in the driver’s name column using a black pen in the written report on the driver’s status statement, and marked off to and from the name of the Defendant.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the defendant forged the driver's column of the state-owned driver's statement report, which is a private document about the certificate of fact.
3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 2, submitted to the said slope E, who was aware of the forgery, a false report on the statement of the situation of the driver, as described in paragraph 2, as if it were duly formed.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.