If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a DK5 car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.163% in blood while under the influence of alcohol at around 0.163% in front of a restaurant, in front of the restaurant, which does not know the name located in the store of the Daegu-gu merchants, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) on the road in front of a restaurant, he/she driven the DK5 car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.163% in blood.

2. On September 17, 2017, at around 01:40, the Defendant, who obstructed the performance of official duties, committed assault against the police officer, such as: (a) the Defendant, who was under the influence of drinking on the road front of the C B, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, expressed that he was fluorous, and expressed to the C, the police officer “Ig Chewing son”; and (b) the Defendant, who was willing to leave the vehicular road, was fluored by the said police officer, and was fluoring the chest of the said police officer on his hand.

Defendant continued to stop the vehicle in front of the defective vehicle that the above police officer intends to leave or depart from the vehicle for the investigation of the traffic accident, and see this Chewing, or cut it.

The police officer interfered with the operation of the police officer's vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning traffic control by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to work log, inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and circumstantial statement reports on drivers of drinking;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Selection of each of the selective fines for punishment (such as the confession of and reflects on the crime of this case, the degree of violence is not serious, and the defendant has no particular criminal history other than the fine imposed once every five years prior to the imposition of a fine, etc., taking into account various circumstances shown in the arguments of this case);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;