However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 18, 2010, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant (B) who is the husband of the said court No. 2010No797 of the said court at the court No. 621, Seo-gu Cheongju District Court No. 621, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, and took an oath.

The Defendant testified to the question of the Defendant (B), “I see that the police officer was tending to be tending on the floor, I would like to go beyond the time when she talked.” The Defendant continued to answer the question of the Defendant (B), “I would like to see whether the police officer, who was in the A-I-I-I-I-I-I-be, sees two strings with a view to leaving the vehicle back to the rear, and going beyond the floor, and immediately the police officer went up on the floor, so I would like to see whether the Defendant (B) was able to go up to this shock, and I asked the Defendant (B)’s question, “I asked the Defendant (B), but the video was not the voice of the Defendant (B),” and “I asked the Prosecutor’s testimony as “I will continue to answer the question of the Prosecutor’s “I”.

However, at around 23:03 on June 27, 2009, the Defendant was carrying the car on the Chief of B and driving the car, and was under the influence of drinking control from the border E belonging to the D District Unit of the Chungcheong Police Station D District of the Chungcheong Police Station at the time of Chungcheongju, and the Defendant was under the influence of drinking. On the other hand, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties without any specific resistance, after putting the string of the string, the Defendant was under the influence of drinking control from the border E, etc. belonging to the D District of the Chungcheong Police Station D District at the time of Chungcheongju.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a witness who has taken an oath, made a false statement contrary to his memory, and perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The defendant in the second trial record of the Cheongju District Court 2010No797 case.