beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.20 2016나9670

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is added to the evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized

Therefore, this court's reasoning is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of

2. On the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, Paragraph 1-2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the plaintiff was from her completion," "the plaintiff owned each of the real estate of this case," and "the plaintiff conspired to take a letter" of the second behavior with "provoking to take a letter" respectively.

According to the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 6, 7 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 3, and the whole purport of the pleadings, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 8, and 3, the plaintiff owned each of the real estate of this case. ② With respect to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 1, 2012, the registration of transfer of ownership (the cause of registration: the sale as of May 21, 2012) under the receipt No. 9831 of the separate sheet No. 9831, May 22, 2012 (the cause of registration: the sale as of May 21, 2012) is recognized by the defendant C as the registration office of ownership transfer (the cause of registration as of May 21, 2012).

The grounds of the judgment of the first instance court are as follows. Paragraph 2 (1) to 5 of the same Article.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) No. 11, 12, and 4 of the A, “Evidence No. 11, 12, 19 of the A, and No. 4 and 12 of the A” in Paragraph (2) 6 of the same Article.

③ Defendant B and D shall invite the Plaintiff by public offering, thereby inducing each of the instant real estate.