A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The above fine.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct are those who engage in agricultural products wholesale business from Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F with the trade name “C”, and Defendant B is those who operate food materials supply business with the trade name “H” from Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si G with H.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, around January 2013, the Defendants conspired to deliver middle and high schools with the country of origin falsely indicating the origin as the domestic source, and then Defendant B printed out the country of origin as the country of origin as the country, and then brought to Defendant A by printing out the country of origin as the country, the country of origin as the country, and the country of origin as the country, the Defendant A attached the country of China and the country of origin to the middle and high schools, and then again delivers the country of origin to Defendant B, and Defendant B re-issued the above two wave and the country of origin to the relevant school.

In such a way, from January 2013 to April 3, 2013, the Defendants offered approximately 2,195 g of the Chinese small and medium-sized washing rooms and approximately 4,248.8kg of the Republic of Korea to Jeju, China, China, and the origin of China 21,598.47kg, with each false indication, and supplied it to Incheon, Incheon, and Busan, and 28 elementary and middle-school areas including J High Schools in Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu.

2. The Defendant C, a representative of the Defendant, at the same time and place as in paragraph (1) above, supplied a false delivery of the middle and high-frequency party service and the origin of both waves to Korea, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A, Corporation C]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. The K's statement;

1. Food materials, the delivery of the materials, the school list, the results of the bids, the places of origin false labelling, the anti-domestic political products, and the food materials with country of origin false labelling.