근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative of the Bank of Bankruptcy D in South-gu, Nam-gu, and runs a manufacturing business with 20 full-time workers.
Nevertheless, Defendant 2 did not pay KRW 65,223,720 of E’s retirement pay on June 1, 2015, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and paid KRW 295,185,720 of the eight retired workers, who were employed in the business, to whom he/she had been employed in the business, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment period between the parties.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable law: Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers, and Article 9 of the same Act;
(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers.
C. A written agreement is submitted by the victims to the effect that the defendant does not want the punishment after the indictment.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;