대여금
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 96,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from December 17, 2013 to the day of full payment.
On December 16, 2003, the defendant agreed that a notary public shall pay to the plaintiff a total of KRW 100 million each on the last day of May 2004 through February 2005 with the notarial deed No. 3054 of 2003, a notary public, to the plaintiff on December 16, 2003, a total of KRW 100,000,000,000,000 from May 200 to February 2005. The fact that the defendant paid KRW 4 million out of the money agreed to the plaintiff does not conflict between
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the agreed amount of KRW 96 million and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from December 17, 2013 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of the original copy of the instant payment order.
The defendant asserts that, due to the violation of C's agreement, he only prepared the above notarial deed to the plaintiff while he was faced with a crisis of criminal punishment due to the violation of C's Check Act, and there is no direct transaction between the plaintiff. However, even if the defendant's assertion is true, it is difficult to view that the defendant's preparation of notarial deed is invalid or there is a ground for revocation.
The defendant's argument is without merit.