beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고단1933

전기통신금융사기피해방지및피해금환급에관한특별법위반등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for two years, respectively.

Nos. 9, 10 of seized evidence A from Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Persons whose method of crime, name of conspiracy is unknown, F, etc., and the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China").

In addition, the call center was established, and then the call center was established, and then the phone lives phone calls using data servers in which personal information such as contact information was stored and misrepresented by the prosecutor's office investigator, etc., and the victims transfer the money deposited in the account under the names of the victims to the so-called "face passbook" account, or input personal information such as the account number, etc. on the Internet site of the false public prosecutor's office, and then transfer the money deposited in the account of victims to the facebook account (hereinafter referred to as " Bophishing").

A plan was planned.

A person whose name of operating the call center is not known according to the above crime plan will transfer the money deposited in the account under the name of the victims to the bank passbook account; and the above F will provide loans by increasing the transaction performance to the person who opened the bank passbook as a person in charge of the general manager of the team to withdraw the singishing crime.

or the withdrawal of the purchase fund of shares shall be paid.

By means of doing so, it was intended to draw up and draw up the amount of damage to the operator of the call center by withdrawing the amount of damage, such as inviting the account holder to deliver the amount of damage withdrawn by the person who entered the call center.

On the other hand, Defendant A was proposed to offer KRW 200,000 to KRW 300,000 per cash withdrawal from the above F on January 1, 2016, and served as a team leader for the crime of Bosing 200,000 won. From February 1, 2016, Defendant A, as the team leader of the withdrawn 2 team team, took a role of monitoring the opener of the presidential passbook as a team leader, and sent the amount of damage from the said F to the said F upon taking a photograph of the opening of the presidential passbook pursuant to the said F’s direction, and Defendant B sent the amount of damage from the account directed by the said F.