When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an employee on the ground that the Victim C in Songpa-gu Seoul had no operation of the massage in D hotel E managed by the victim C in Songpa-gu, Seoul; (b) caused the worker and the city expenses, and (c) destroyed by destroying a single computer monitor equivalent to KRW 200,000, the market price of the victim in the room, one of which is equivalent to KRW 100,000,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 100,000,000, one of the toilets glass of the toilet-gu, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 10,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report on occurrence of property;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act regarding the facts constituting an offense, the choice of a fine (including the fact that a fine is recognized and rebuttals, and the fact that the amount equivalent to the value of damaged goods has been repaid to the victim

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;