When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 23:30 on October 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated that the taxi driver who found a mobile phone that the Defendant gets from the Defendant’s daily driving was trying to steals without returning the mobile phone obtained by the taxi driver; and (b) took a bath to the above E; (c) the Defendant: (a) the f district border of the Seoul Northern Police Station, the Defendant prevented the Defendant; and (d) the f district border of the Gwangju Northern Police Station, the Defendant prevented the Defendant; (b) the instant G from selling the ice one time by hand, and (c) the Defendant took a bath to the following: (a) the Defendant “at the time”.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by the police officer G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Application of the statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,00,000, in consideration of the fact that the crime of this case in the sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was derived from the misunderstanding of the defendant, the defendant committed the crime of this case by contingently during his commission, and the defendant did not have any criminal record exceeding the fine