1. Around March 2009, the Defendant purchased C’s land in the name of his/her his/her husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s wife. Since November of the same year, construction of the second floor building was promoted on the above land.

(State)The Defendant is anticipated to be able to obtain PF loans from the Do Private Savings Bank and carried out the new construction of a building; however, on February 201, 201, the Do Private Savings Bank was unable to prepare construction cost, such as receiving a disposition of business suspension, etc.; thus, he was willing to borrow money from the victim F who was introduced through E working as the head of the Defendant’s new construction site.

On March 25, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the “H” restaurant operated by the Defendant, which was located in G, on March 25, 201, the Defendant: (b) “Along with the construction of a double-story building on the land of 509 square meters in the name of his/her husband and wife C in the name of his/her husband and wife D; and (c) at the present time, the occurrence related to the construction is the total construction cost of KRW 120,000,000 and the construction cost equivalent to KRW 70,000,000,000 already entered into. On the completion of the construction, if the building is able to lend an amount equivalent to KRW 1 billion upon completion of the construction, and if

However, the Defendant’s new construction of the Defendant’s building is a construction project that requires at least 880,000 won, while the money that the Defendant had existed around the time of commencement of the construction is merely equivalent to KRW 180,000,000,000 and thus, the Defendant was required to borrow money exceeding KRW 700,000 from others. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to establish the first right to collateral security for the said building. In addition, the Defendant was liable for the Defendant’s debt equivalent to KRW 56,00,000,000, such as credit card arrears, in addition to the above 190,000,000 won as notified to the

The defendant is against the victim.