상습사기등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The judgment below
Defendant 1 and 2 in a disturbance of criminal history. “The Defendant on January 19, 2017.”
The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, but in full view of the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable and unfair. Thus, the above argument is without merit.
Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for fraud, interference with business, etc. at Jeju District Court on January 19, 2017, and the execution of the sentence was completed in a prison on March 10, 2018.
“The Defendant,” on October 19, 201, was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months in the Jeju High Court of Gwangju on October 19, 201, imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Jeju District Court on October 12, 2012, and two years and six months in prison for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Jeju District Court on June 19, 2014, and completed the execution of the said punishment on March 10, 2018, upon being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Jeju District Court on January 19, 2017.
It is clear that the erroneous holding of office " is clear, and the summary of the evidence of the judgment of the court below is omitted at the end, and it is clear that the statement of the "Habitualness of the judgment of the court below is omitted, in view of the fact that each of the instant frauds of the same kind is committed repeatedly within a short period after release in different records of the crime in the judgment, and that such behavior is recognized." Thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1)