특수강도미수등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Judgment on the Grounds for Appeal
A. The contents of the facts charged are as follows: (a) the Defendants wished to obtain a loan from E; and (b) some of them were received from E; and (c) the Defendants got profit from it. However, around March 2012, 200, at the 3rd floor room of Gmotong-gu, dong-gu, dong-gu, dong-gu, the Defendants intended to obtain the initial loan; (d) intended to change the mind that E would not obtain the initial loan; and (e) allowed the Defendant to obtain the loan by force by assault; and (e) failed to obtain part of the loan from the Defendant’s prosecutor’s office; and (e) failed to obtain the aforementioned loan from the Defendant’s prosecutor’s office in accordance with the previous prosecutor’s prior records and equipment; and (e) the Defendants failed to obtain the aforementioned loan from the Defendant’s prosecutor’s office, and (e) failed to obtain the remainder of the money from the Defendant’s prosecutor’s office, and (e) failed to obtain the Defendant’s mobile phone loan from the Defendant E.