건물퇴거
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: (a) 4, 6, and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) 4, 6, and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) citing this case
【As seen earlier, insofar as the instant improvement project was implemented for the Busan Northern District, which includes the instant building, and the removal of the said building is scheduled, it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff has the obligation to protect the opportunity to recover the premium or to compensate for the amount equivalent to the premium (proviso of Article 10-4(1) and Article 10(1)7 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act).”
2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.