손해배상
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 300,00 for each of the KRW 34,878,141 for Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and C, and each of them from July 21, 2012 to July 201, 2017.
1. 손해배상책임의 발생 사실인정의 근거 : 갑 1∽5, 11∽12호증, 을 2호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재 또는 영상, 변론 전체의 취지 D은 2012. 7. 21. 11:14경 E 자동차(이하 ‘피고차량’)를 운전하여 안산시 단원구 성곡동 675-8 도로상을 해안로 방면에서 공단안길 방면 편도 1차로 도로상을 시속 약 3-40Km 속도로 직진 주행하던 중, 전방좌우를 잘 살펴 안전하게 운전하여야 할 업무상 주의의무를 게을리 하여, 같은 방향 우측 길가장자리에 주차된 F 자동차(이하 ‘원고차량’) 운전석 문을 열고 있던 원고 A을 들이받아 뇌진탕 등의 상해를 입게 하였다
(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is the comprehensive automobile insurance insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff B and C are the parents of the Plaintiff Company A.
The defendant is the insurer of the defendant vehicle and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.
책임제한 주장에 관한 판단 : ▷피고는 이 사건 사고 장소가 주차금지구역이고, 원고 A이 서있던 장소도 차로 중앙이었으므로 위 원고의 과실이 참작되어야 한다고 주장한다.
▷그러나 피고 주장사실을 인정할 증거가 없다.
Rather, the instant accident was caused by the Plaintiff A, who was parked on the side due to the violation of the duty to stop on the front side and the duty to drive safely, and thus, the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s vehicle does not interfere with the normal course of the Defendant’s vehicle. Therefore, the causal link between the Plaintiff’s side parking and boarding, etc. cannot be acknowledged.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.
2.For the convenience of calculating the scope of liability for damages, less than a month shall be counted in the side on which the appraised value is less than the minimum, and less than the last month and less than a source shall be discarded, and at the time of the accident, the present price shall be calculated by deducting the intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 per cent per month.