When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the resident of B apartment house C in Jinju, the victim D(the victim D, the 30 years of age) who resides in the upper floor E of the defendant, and there was a dispute over the issue of noise between floors.

1. Around November 29, 2019, the Defendant threatened the victim by stating that, in the front corridor of the above apartment E on November 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) in the elevator’s front corridor, he made it difficult for the victim to see that the victim was sensitive to himself; and (b) in the course of making the victim and the victim with the time expenses, the Defendant threatened the victim by saying, “I will be allowed to go to TV in width; (b) I will die all of his family members and come to TV.”

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s face one time in drinking alone on the ground that the victim, who was threatened, in the time and place set forth in the above Paragraph 1, recorded the Defendant’s act into a mobile phone at the time and place, as described in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Investigation report (Evidence List No. 4, 11) [Defendant and defense counsel] asserts that there was a fact that the defendant took a detailed attitude that the defendant would have taken the victim's hand, but there was no fact that the victim's face was calculated. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the above argument cannot be accepted since the defendant was found to have inflicted physical force on the part of the victim's eyebrow because it was found that the defendant had taken the part of the

1. Relevant Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant was unable to receive a letter from the victim, but the defendant's mistake is recognized, and the extent of the type of the defendant's exercise is relatively insignificant.