beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.23 2016나61029

손해배상(건)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the evidence submitted in this court are examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance

Therefore, this court's judgment is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except where the third-party claim in the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this court's judgment is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420

② Handrails are installed up to the point of the instant accident. There are columns at the point of the instant accident, and no rail is installed.

However, since a rail installed is likely to fall behind the rail, it would have been able to prevent the accident of this case if the plaintiff paid early attention.

In addition, the accident of this case seems to have caused the plaintiff to enter the corner of the swimming pool which was not installed with a photograph affixed at the free time, and the plaintiff could be unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.