The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of all of the facts charged in the instant case, including: (a) the injury inflicted upon the victim E; (b) the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; (c) the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion); and (d) the embezzlement. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical

On the other hand, the defendant appealed to the remaining guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal nor any statement of the grounds for appeal in the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.