“Along with the disturbance, it interfered with the victim’s accommodation business for about 2 hours by force, i.e., the victim’s disturbance, and the victim’s disturbance, as the victim’s guest H, who frightly fright to frighten as the fright to fright to fright together with fright to fright to fright to fright to frighten

2. The Defendant damaged the property at the time, time, at the place specified in paragraph (a) of Section 1, the victim I, installed in the above restaurant garment shop, from the time, in front of the restaurant as above, damaged the said stack so that it can not repair the said stacks by exposing up several entrance doors owned by the victim I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of the witness D, J (the crime of subparagraph 1-A, (b), F, H (the crime of subparagraph 1-C of the above decision), and I (the crime of subparagraph 2 of the ruling);

1. G statements;

1. Investigation report (as to the situation at the time of dispatch to the site)

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, inquiry into criminal records, results of search of persons subject to investigation, report of investigation (verification of records of the same type of crime), investigation report* Application of Acts and subordinate statutes and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Aggravation of repeated crimes: Article 35 of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: It shall be decided as per the disposition for not less than the reasons under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

The grounds for sentencing (within the scope of the sentencing guidelines) basic areas of interference with the duties (where the degree of such repeated crime, threat of force or deceptive scheme, or the degree of interference with the duties is minor): June -1 area of mitigation (where actual damage is minor, penalty not to be imposed): June -1 year and June: the processing of multiple offenses: On June -6: On September 24, 2010, the processing of multiple offenses: On June 6: On June 6: On February 24, 2010, the fine of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000