【2016 order 478】

1. On February 28, 2014, the Defendant in breach of trust: (a) at the D restaurant run by the Defendant located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu; (b) at the D restaurant run by the Defendant; (c) at the 26 Guide; and (d) at the 400,000 won per Guide; and (c) at the 10,000,000 won per Guide, the Defendant organized and operated

From the above date to June 30, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 34 million from the victim E to June 30, 2015, in 17 times, each of which is the cause of the above number fraternity, from the victim F who is the cause of the above number fraternity, and received KRW 800,000,000 from the victim F who is the cause of the above number fraternity, for 16 times every 12,80,000 won as the payment for the above number fraternity for the above number fraternity, and received from the victim G who was the cause of the above number fraternity from February 28, 2014 to the end of August 2014, 40,000 won as the payment for the above number fraternity from the victim G to the end of the above number fraternity, every seven times as the payment for the above number fraternity.

Since the Defendant received the aforementioned advance payment from the victims, the Defendant was obligated to pay the victim E an advance payment of KRW 50 million as an advance payment, KRW 20 million as an advance payment to the victim F, and KRW 10 million as an advance payment to the victim G, and KRW 70 million as an advance payment.

Nevertheless, the defendant, on July 2015, escaped to the unsatisfy, without paying an incentive to the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 70 million in the above accounts, and suffered damages equivalent to the same amount from the victims.

2. Fraud;

A. A. Around August 2013, the Defendant: (a) sold money to the Victim H to the said D cafeteria for the part payment of the part payment of the said apartment; and (b) sold the said money to the Victim H.

“ ................”

However, in fact, the defendant used bonds at the time, while paying interest, was in the situation where he borrowed money from the injured party, and he thought that it will be used to prevent the return of interest on other bonds even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he will pay the borrowed money properly.